Re: | Ross Stores, Inc. |
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2010 | |
Filed March 30, 2010 | |
File No. 0-14678 |
1. | It appears that exhibits 10.34, 10.36, 10.48, 10.54, 10.59, 10.60, 10.64, 10.65, 10.68, 10.71 and 10.72 have not been filed in their entirety. In your next periodic report, please file these exhibits in their entirety. | ||
In reviewing the
referenced exhibits, we have noted that each of them makes reference to an
“Exhibit A” which is not included. We believe that to be the basis for the
Staff’s comment.
In the case of
exhibit 10.48, in our next periodic report, we will file the exhibit in
its entirety, with the “Exhibit A”
attachment.
|
In the case of
exhibits 10.34, 10.36, 10.54, 10.59, 10.60, 10.64, 10.65, 10.68, 10.71 and
10.72 (that is, each of the cited exhibits other than exhibit 10.48), the
omitted “Exhibit A” is a company standard form of general release, which
does not vary among the individual agreements (there is an applicable form
for California-based executives, and an applicable form for New York-based
executives). Both forms of general release were filed and included as part of exhibit 10.35
(which incorporates by reference exhibit 10.5 filed with our Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 2, 2009). Rather than
duplicate the same form of release with every exhibit, we propose to
address the comment in our next periodic report by filing in its entirety
(with the two forms of general release) exhibit 10.36. Exhibits 10.36 and
10.35 are the generic forms of the executive employment agreements we
currently use, and the form of general release attached to the generic
forms is the same form attached to the agreements with the individual
executives. We propose to then provide expanded incorporation by reference
notes for each of the remaining cited exhibits, to reference both the
individual agreement (as previously filed) and the applicable generic form
of agreement with respect to the “Exhibit A” form of general release. We
believe this approach will appropriately address the comment, while
avoiding repetition and making apparent for readers the uniformity of this
attachment.
|
|||
2. | We note the $600 million revolving credit facility referenced on page 26 and elsewhere in the Form 10-K. Please explain why the agreement has not been filed as an exhibit. | ||
We advise the
Staff that we do not believe that our revolving credit facility is a
“material contract” for purposes of Item 601(b)(10) of Regulation S-K
(“Item 601(b)(10)”) and is therefore not required to be filed as an
exhibit.
Under paragraph
(ii) of Item 601(b)(10), “[i]f the contract is such as ordinarily
accompanies the kind of business conducted by the registrant and its
subsidiaries, it will be deemed to have been made in the ordinary course
of business and need not be filed unless it falls within one or more of
the following categories, in which case it shall be filed except where
immaterial in amount or significance.” We believe that revolving credit
facilities are commonplace in our industry, and ordinarily accompany the
kind of business we conduct.
Paragraph (ii) of
Item 601(b)(10) then lists four specific categories of agreements (A
through D) which must be considered. The revolving credit facility does
not fit within any of those four categories. It is not a contract to which
our directors, officers or significant stockholders is a party (category
A), a contract upon which our business is substantially dependent
(category B), a contract calling for the acquisition or sale of property,
plant or equipment for a consideration exceeding 15 percent of such fixed
assets (category C), or a material lease under which a part of our
property is held (category D). The closest potentially applicable category
could be category B, however that category is focused on commercially
unique and competitively strategic arrangements:
|
|||
“B. Any contract
upon which the registrant’s business is substantially dependent, as in the
case of continuing contracts to sell the major part of registrant’s
products or services or to purchase the major part of registrant’s
requirements of goods, services or raw materials or any franchise or
license or other agreement to use a patent, formula, trade secret, process
or trade name upon which registrant’s business depends to a material
extent.”
|
That is not a
category which encompasses ordinary commercial banking
products.
We also note that
the revolving credit facility is not material to our operations. We have
had no significant borrowings under the facility at any time, and we have
not had any borrowings under it since September 2008.
Ross Stores, Inc.
acknowledges that:
|
cc: | Deloitte & Touche LLP |
Bradley J. Rock, DLA Piper LLP (US) |